Hotel performance attributes and consumer complaints in online reviews

Authors

  • Farzaneh S. Zoghi SRH University of Applied Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/rsep-2025-0004

Keywords:

Hotel Performance Attributes, Consumer Complaining Behaviour, Online Review, SERVEQUAL, Hospitality Service

Abstract

Understanding customer complaints is crucial for improving the quality of hotel service. This study examines hotel performance attributes based on consumer-generated online reviews, specifically focusing on negative reviews from a major hotel-rating platform. By analyzing 35 hotels with the highest number of negative reviews, the research identifies the most criticized attributes, revealing that "tangibles"—including physical facilities, cleanliness, and room conditions—are the primary sources of dissatisfaction.

The study employs the SERVQUAL model to categorize service quality attributes into five dimensions: reliability, assurance, tangibles, empathy, and responsiveness. Findings indicate that tangibles account for 83% of customer complaints, followed by responsiveness, empathy, assurance, and reliability. Using qualitative data analysis software, the research further explores specific problem areas within tangibles, such as hotel décor, room amenities, and service facilities. Common complaints include outdated furnishings, poor cleanliness, malfunctioning equipment, and uncomfortable beds.

The paper also highlights the role of online reviews in shaping consumer behavior. Negative reviews are particularly influential, as they affect potential guests' perceptions and purchasing decisions. Furthermore, customer complaint behaviour (CCB) is examined, emphasizing that dissatisfied customers often express grievances through online platforms, influencing broader consumer sentiment. Previous studies suggest that service failures, particularly in high-rated hotels, lead to significant online complaints, reinforcing the importance of addressing core service deficiencies.

The research underscores the necessity for hotel managers to monitor and respond to online complaints proactively. Addressing tangible service issues can enhance customer satisfaction, improve online ratings, and increase willingness to pay. Ultimately, leveraging online reviews as a strategic tool can help hotels refine service offerings and strengthen customer loyalty in an increasingly competitive industry.

 

References

Albayrak, T., Caber, M., & Aksoy, S. (2010). Relationships of the tangible and intangible elements of tourism products with overall customer satisfaction. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 1(2), 140–143.

Alzaid, A. A., & Soliman, A. A. (2002). Service quality in Riyadh’s elite hotels: Measurement and evaluation. King Saud University Journal (Administrative Sciences), 14(2), 83–103.

Browning, V., So, K. K. F., & Sparks, B. (2013). The influence of online reviews on consumers’ attributions of service quality and control for service standards in hotels. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(1–2), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2013.750971

Callan, R. J. (1997). An attributional approach to hotel selection. Part 1: The managers’ perceptions. Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 3(4), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1603(199712)3:4<333::AID-PTH116>3.0.CO;2-C

Callan, R. J. (1998). An attributional approach to hotel selection. Part 2: The customers’ perceptions. Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 4(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1603(199803)4:1<67::AID-PTH131>3.0.CO;2-1

Crié, D. (2003). Consumers’ complaint behaviour: Taxonomy, typology, and determinants: Towards a unified ontology. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 11(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.dbm.3240206

cswenson. (2021, April 15). How online reviews influence sales. Medill Spiegel Research Center. https://spiegel.medill.northwestern.edu/how-online-reviews-influence-sales/

Cunningham, P., Smyth, B., Wu, G., & Greene, D. (2010). Does TripAdvisor make hotels better?

Fedewa, D. (2021). Five-star growth: Using online ratings to design better products. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/five-star-growth-using-online-ratings-to-design-better-products

Gartner. (2024). How to improve customer loyalty and retention. Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/en/customer-service-support/insights/customer-loyalty

Gyung Kim, M., Wang, C., & Mattila, A. S. (2010). The relationship between consumer complaining behavior and service recovery: An integrative review. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 22(7), 975–991. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111011066635

Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073

Hu, N., Zhang, T., Gao, B., & Bose, I. (2019). What do hotel customers complain about? Text analysis using structural topic model. Tourism Management, 72, 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.01.002

Johnston, R. (1995). The zone of tolerance: Exploring the relationship between service transactions and satisfaction with the overall service. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(2), 46–61.

Kobiruzzaman, M. M. (2020, September 15). Five dimensions of service quality – SERVQUAL model of service quality. Newsmoor. https://newsmoor.com/servqual-model-five-key-service-dimensions-servqual-gaps-reasons/

Lockwood, A. J., Jones, P., & Bowen, A. (2004). UK hospitality and tourism SMEs: Differentiation by size, location, and owner style. Tourism Hospitality Planning & Development, 1(1), 7–11.

Masiero, L., Yoonjoung Heo, C., & Pan, B. (2015). Determining guests’ willingness to pay for hotel room attributes with a discrete choice model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 49, 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.06.001

Marić, D., et al. (2016). Analysis of tangible and intangible hotel service quality components. Industrija, 44(1).

Noone, B., McGuire, K., & Rohlfs, K. (2011). Social media meets hotel revenue management: Opportunities, issues, and unanswered questions. Journal of Revenue & Pricing Management, 10. https://doi.org/10.1057/rpm.2011.12

Oberoi, U., & Hales, C. (1990). Assessing the quality of the conference hotel service product: Towards an empirically based model. Service Industries Journal, 10(4), 700–721.

Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and the implications for future research. Journal of Marketing Management, 49, 41–51.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perception of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 35–48.

Phillips, P., Barnes, S., Zigan, K., & Schegg, R. (2017). Understanding the impact of online reviews on hotel performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Travel Research, 56(2), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516636481

Runge, J. (2024, January 5). Online review statistics you need to know for 2024. Gominga. https://gominga.com/online-review-statistics/

Sann, R., Lai, P.-C., Liaw, S.-Y., & Chen, C.-T. (2022). Predicting online complaining behavior in the hospitality industry: Application of big data analytics to online reviews. Sustainability, 14(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031800

Sundaram, D. S., Mitra, K., & Webster, C. (1998, January 1). Word-of-mouth communications: A motivational analysis. Advances in Consumer Research. https://openurl.ebsco.com/contentitem/gcd:83386489?sid=ebsco:plink:crawler&id=ebsco:gcd:83386489

Yang, Z., Peterson, R. T., & Cai, S. (2003). Service quality dimensions of internet retailing: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Services Marketing, 17(7), 685–700. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040310501241

Yuksel, A., Kilinc, U., & Yuksel, F. (2006). Cross-national analysis of hotel customers’ attitudes toward complaining and their complaining behaviours. Tourism Management, 27(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.07.007

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Review of Socio-Economic Perspectives

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright and Open Access Policy

The Review of Socio-Economic Perspectives (RSEP) is committed to the principles of open access and the widest possible dissemination of scholarly knowledge. The journal provides immediate and unrestricted access to all published content, enabling readers worldwide to freely read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles without financial, legal, or technical barriers.

RSEP supports the principles of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), which advocates free and unrestricted access to peer-reviewed scholarly research.

Copyright Ownership

Authors retain the copyright of their published works.

By submitting and publishing their manuscripts in RSEP, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish, reproduce, distribute, archive, index, and preserve the work in electronic and other formats for scholarly communication purposes.

The journal does not require authors to transfer copyright ownership to the publisher. Authors remain the legal copyright holders of their work after publication.

Licensing Policy

Beginning with Volume 2025, all articles published in RSEP are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, users are permitted to:

  • Read, download, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
  • Share the work with others;
  • Adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material;

provided that:

  • Appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal;
  • A link to the license is provided;
  • Any changes made to the original work are clearly indicated;
  • The material is not used for commercial purposes.

The full license terms are available at:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

 

Previous Licensing Policy

Articles published before Volume 2025 were distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

The CC BY 4.0 license permits unrestricted use, distribution, adaptation, and reproduction in any medium, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source.

Articles published under CC BY 4.0 remain subject to the licensing terms that were in effect at the time of publication and are not retroactively relicensed.

Rights Retained by Authors

Authors retain the right to:

  • Share their published articles on personal websites, institutional repositories, and academic networking platforms;
  • Reuse parts or all of their work in future publications, books, teaching materials, and presentations;
  • Deposit the published version of the article in repositories without embargo;
  • Disseminate and promote their research freely.

Rights Granted to the Publisher

Authors grant RSEP the right to:

  • Publish and disseminate the work as the original publisher;
  • Archive and preserve the article permanently;
  • Include the article in indexing, abstracting, and database services;
  • Maintain the official version of record;
  • Promote and distribute the published work through journal platforms and scholarly communication channels.

Open Access Statement

RSEP is a fully open-access journal. All articles are made freely available online immediately upon publication without subscription fees or access restrictions.

No embargo period is applied. Readers may access and use published content in accordance with the applicable Creative Commons license.

The journal believes that open access increases the global visibility, accessibility, usage, and impact of scholarly research while promoting the free exchange of scientific knowledge.

License Consistency

To ensure transparency and compliance with international indexing standards, the licensing information displayed on the journal website, article metadata, PDF files, and publishing platforms will remain consistent and accurately reflect the licensing terms applicable to each published volume.