Publication Ethics & Publication Malpractice
RSEP PUBLICATION ETHICS & PUBLICATION MALPRACTICE
Review of Socio-Economic Perspectives, follows and consider
COPE Principles of Transparency and Best Practice Guidelines and the COPE Code of Conduct.
Fore more details, please visit:
Duties & Responsibilities of Editors
Editors should
– responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
– guided by the policies of the journal’s editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
– evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
– always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed
– maintain the integrity of the academic record
For more details, please visit:
http://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_1.pdf
Duties & Responsibilities of Authors;
Authors should
– required to agree with this open access policy which enables unrestricted access and reuse of all published articles
– take collective responsibility for submitted and published work
– adhere to publication requirements that submitted work is original, is not plagiarised, and has not been published elsewhere
– should present their results clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation
Fore more details, please visit:
http://publicationethics.org/files/International%20standards_authors_for%20website_11_Nov_2011.pdf
Duties & Responsibilities of Reviewers
Reviewers should
– only agree to review manuscripts for which they have the subject expertise required to carry out a proper assessment and which they can assess in a timely manner
– not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor
– respect the confidentiality of peer review and not reveal any details of a manuscript or its review, during or after the peer-review process, beyond those that are released by the journal
– be done their job objectively
– express their views clearly with supporting arguments
– acknowledge that peer review is largely a reciprocal endeavour and undertake to carry out their fair share of reviewing and in a timely manner
For more details, please visit:
https://publicationethics.org/files/Ethical_guidelines_for_peer_reviewers_0.pdf
Open Access Policy
Review of Socio-Economic Perspectives is an open access journal. Open Access means that all content is free of charge to the researchers and institutions. Also Authors are required to agree with this open access policy. Researchers are enabled to read, download, copy, print, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Copyright Policy
Review of Socio-Economic Perspectives uses Creative Commons copyright license policy CC-BY. Copyrights remain with the authors. The authors give permission
to the RSEP to publish their work and agree that users are allowed to copy and redistribute the work, transform and build upon it by sign the RSEP Copyright Agreement
