Sustainability-Oriented Pedagogy as A Socio-Economic Strategy: A Mixed-Methods Empirical Study in Mexican FLE Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/rsep-2025-0019Keywords:
Sustainability-Oriented Pedagogy, Foreign Language Education, Socio-Economic Perspectives, Mixed-Methods ResearchAbstract
Sustainability-oriented pedagogy has emerged as a key priority in higher education, particularly in emerging economies where environmental deterioration, socio-economic inequality, and structural vulnerabilities converge. This mixed-methods empirical study examines the socio-economic, linguistic, and ecological impact of sustainability-based instructional interventions implemented within a French as a Foreign Language (FLE) program at the University of Colima, Mexico. Four pedagogical projects—Linguistic Garden, Sustainable Recipes, a circular-economy flea market, and structured sustainability debates—were deployed over one semester.
Quantitative analyses based on a dataset (N = 48) indicate substantial gains in ecological awareness (+32%), responsible consumption attitudes (+27%), and oral fluency development (+18%). Qualitative findings drawn from students’ reflective journals and class observations reveal deepened socio-economic consciousness, heightened civic engagement, and meaningful linguistic progress. Participant narratives highlight behavioral changes beyond the classroom, including reduced waste generation, increased preference for local products, improved awareness of food systems, and greater ecological responsibility.
The findings underscore the potential of language programs to cultivate ecological citizenship, socio-economic awareness, and civic participation alongside linguistic-development goals. The study provides a framework for embedding sustainability transversally into language curricula and offers implications for educational policy, curriculum design, and pedagogical innovation.
References
American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 33–40.
Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, Article 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224
Berkes, F. (2017). Sacred ecology (4th ed.). Routledge.
Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. ELT Journal, 66(3), 283–292.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship: Essays and reflections. Multilingual Matters.
Cebrián, G., & Junyent, M. (2015). Competencies in education for sustainable development: Exploring the student teachers’ views. Sustainability, 7(3), 2768–2786. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7032768
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
Gadotti, M. (2008). Education for sustainability: A critical contribution to the Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Green Theory & Praxis Journal, 1(1), 15–64.
IPCC. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/
Jickling, B., & Sterling, S. (2017). Post-sustainability and environmental education: Remaking education for the future. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kramsch, C. (2013). Language and culture. Oxford University Press.
Leicht, A., Heiss, J., & Byun, W. J. (Eds.). (2018). Issues and trends in education for sustainable development. UNESCO.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformative learning theory. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3–33). Jossey-Bass.
Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters.
OECD. (2019). OECD learning compass 2030: A series of concept notes. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Ryan, A., & Tilbury, D. (2013). Flexible pedagogies: New pedagogical ideas. Higher Education Academy.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Putting the human back in “human research methodology”: The researcher in mixed methods research. SAGE.
Tilbury, D. (2011). Education for sustainable development: An expert review of processes and learning. UNESCO.
UNDP. (2022). Human development report 2022: Uncertain times, unsettled lives. United Nations Development Programme. https://hdr.undp.org/
UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2019). Education for sustainable development: Towards achieving the SDGs (ESD for 2030). UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2021). Futures of education: Learning to become. UNESCO Publishing.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Vare, P., & Scott, W. (2007). Learning for a change: Exploring the relationship between education and sustainable development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1(2), 191–198.
Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6
